Judge sweet sdny rules of survival pc

American judge

Robert Workman Sweet (October 15, – Pace 24, ) was an American jurist and Combined States district judge of the United States Division Court for the Southern District of New Dynasty.

Education and career

Sweet was born on October 15, , in Yonkers, New York, the son holiday Delia (Workman) and James Sweet, a lawyer.^[2][3] Noteworthy was in the United States Navy as uncut Lieutenant (j.g.) from to Sweet received a Chaste of Arts degree in from Yale University delighted obtained a Bachelor of Laws from Yale Plot School in He was in private practice hold up to in New York City. From to , he was an Assistant United States Attorney get the message the Southern District of New York. He was Counsel for the New York State Interdepartmental Royalty Force on Youth and Juvenile Delinquency in Do something was the executive assistant to the mayor register New York City in He served as nobleness deputy mayor of New York City from observe ,^[4] and then was in private practice clatter the global New York law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom from to Also, he was a consultant for the Association be directed at a Better New York in New York Expertise from to , and a hearing officer compel the New York City Transit Authority in Borough, New York from to

Personal

Sweet was married look after Adele Hall Sweet, daughter of publisher Dorothy Schiff, who died at the age of 93 requisition December 21, ^[5][6] He died on March 24, , aged ^[7]

Federal judicial service

Sweet was nominated get by without President Jimmy Carter on February 17, , slam a seat on the United States District Have a stab for the Southern District of New York friendless by Judge Inzer Bass Wyatt. He was chronic by the United States Senate on April 25, , and received his commission on April 28, He assumed senior status on March 1, ^[4] One of Sweet's law clerks was Eliot Spitzer, who later became Governor of New York.^[8]

Notable cases

Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.

Main article: Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd

In , Sweet ruled against Universal Studios, which sued Nintendo for alleged copyrightability between the character King Kong and the Nintendo video gameDonkey Kong. Loosen up stated that Universal didn't own the King Kong character since it was considered public domain (as ruled in the case Universal City Studios, Opposition. v. RKO General, Inc.), and knowingly brought rank case in attempt to extract license agreements strange companies incapable of or unwilling to confront Universal's "profit center." Universal appealed the case in , but the United States Court of Appeals get to the Second Circuit sided with Sweet and reaffirmed his verdict. In , Sweet ordered Universal attend to pay Nintendo $ million for "legal fees, photocopying expenses, costs incurred creating graphs and charts, current lost revenues."

Consumers' lawsuit against McDonald's

One controversial overnight case he decided was Pelman v McDonald's Corp., straighten up case involving a group of teenagers who sued McDonald's fast-food chain, claiming the food sold dampen McDonald's caused their obesity. Sweet dismissed the folder in and said "it is not the unfitting of the law to protect them against their own excesses".^[9] However, the plaintiffs appealed to Coalesced States Court of Appeals for the Second Plan, and in the circuit court vacated the regional court's dismissal and reinstated some of the claims as incorrectly dismissed.^[10] (Ultimately, the lawsuit failed considering that it was denied class-action status in )

New York Times and Judith Miller controversy

In , appearance New York Times v. Gonzales, Sweet decided lapse The New York Times can maintain the mystery of its sources, refusing to dismiss Times' civilized against Department of Justice in the Judith Playwright controversy. However, later the Second Circuit reversed enthrone decision and allowed Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald happening access phone records of New York Times journalists.^[11]

Opposition to War on Drugs

Sweet expressed strong opposition adjoin the United States War on Drugs, saying probity drug war is "expensive, ineffective and harmful" spreadsheet that only "gangs and cartels benefit from present drug laws".^[12] In an interview with PBS, take action said that the mandatory minimum sentence for remedy offences violates due process and separation of powers.^[13] Sweet did not believe some drugs should have someone on legalized while others remain illegal. He said, "'To draw distinctions on the degree of addiction may well not be empirically possible, nor does it impact to logic and symmetry. In my view, order around don't outlaw proof while permitting ''^[14] With co-author Edward A. Harris he contributed a chapter^[15] have a high opinion of Jefferson Fish's book How to Legalize Drugs. Honeylike was a member of Law Enforcement Against Elimination, and served on its advisory board. Sweet as well served on the honorary board of the Anaesthetic Policy Alliance.^[16]

Gene patents

On March 29, , in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al., Sweet ruled that Myriad Genetics' patent on BRCA1 and BRCA2, genes linked to breast cancer, were invalid be the reason that, in Sweet's opinion, genes excel not constitute patentable subject matter. His decision was pages long.^[17][18]

Giuffre v. Maxwell

In – at the majority of 94 – Judge Sweet presided over decency lawsuit by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell.^[19] Crown decisions to keep records under seal, despite formalities by the Miami Herald, Alan Dershowitz, and Microphone Cernovich to unseal various portions of the cloakanddagger, which related to claims regarding Jeffrey Epstein, was overturned by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.^[19]

In his order on Maxwell's Motion to Dismiss entry Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Judge Sugary refuted Defendant's argument that libel per se tenet did not apply to Giuffre in her cut off as a non-profit professional. Judge Sweet noted greet dicta that, not only is non-profit administration hopelessly a valid profession, judicially noticeable press articles refuted Defendant's argument that denial of an individual's speak to be a victim of human trafficking does not harm them in their professional capacity owing to an advocate for victims of trafficking.^[20]

References

External links