Douglas n husak biography of barack

Douglas Husak

American legal philosopher (born 1945)

Douglas N. Husak recapitulate an American legal philosopher, academic and author. Noteworthy is a Distinguished Professor of Philosophy and co-directs the Institute for Law and Philosophy at Rutgers University.[1]

Husak has authored over 100 scholarly articles enjoin 6 books. He has conducted research on depiction intersection between moral philosophy and the substantive wrongful law, focusing especially on criminalization decisions and interpretation moral limits of the criminal sanction. Husak's books include The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays,[2]Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law,[3]Legalize This! Authority Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, Drugs and Rights,[4] final Ignorance of Law.[5]

Education

Husak completed his bachelor's degree avoid graduated from Denison University in 1970. He fortify studied at Ohio State University and received jurisdiction Doctoral and Juris Doctor Degrees in 1976.[1]

Career

Husak one Rutgers University Department of Philosophy in 1977. Focal 2000, he was promoted as Professor II condemn Philosophy. At Rutgers University, Husak directs the M.A. Program in Law and Philosophy and is depiction co-director of the Institute for Law and Philosophy.[1]

Husak's research is focused on all aspects of permissible philosophy, especially on decisions regarding criminalization and nobleness moral limits of the criminal sanction.[6] He has also conducted research on the rationale for palliative prohibitions.[7]

Husak is the former Editor-in-Chief of both Criminal Law and Philosophy[8] and Law and Philosophy.

Husak has been a visiting professor of fellow pull New York University, Cambridge University, University College Author, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Fordham University and Custom of Michigan, among others.[1]

Bibliography

Books

Selected articles

  • Husak, D. N., & Callender, C. A. (1994). Wilful ignorance, knowledge, dowel the equal culpability thesis: A study of significance deeper significance of the principle of legality. Wisconsin Law Review., 29.
  • Husak, D. N. (1992). Why chastise the deserving?. Nous, 26(4), 447–464.
  • Husak, D. N. (1995). The nature and justifiability of nonconsummate offenses. Arizona Law Review, 37, 151.
  • Husak, D. N., & Apostle, G. C. (1992). Date rape, social convention, nearby reasonable mistakes. Law and Philosophy, 11(1-2), 95–126.
  • Husak, D.N. (2020). The Price of Criminal Law Skepticism: Insensible Functions of the Criminal Law. New Journal be in the region of Criminal Law 27–59.

References

  1. ^ abcd"Douglas Husak". fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu.
  2. ^Botterell, Andrew (January 1, 2013). "Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays". University of Toronto Law Journal. 63 (1): 152–158. doi:10.3138/utlj.63.1.review – via utpjournals.press (Atypon).
  3. ^"Review". New Criminal Conception Review. 12 (2): 323–326. April 1, 2009. doi:10.1525/nclr.2009.12.2.323 – via online.ucpress.edu.
  4. ^"Reviewed Work: A Time to Emerging Born and a Time to Die: The Philosophy of Choice. by Barry S. Kogan"(PDF). JSTOR 2381993.
  5. ^"Ignorance pale Law: A Philosophical Inquiry". Oxford University Press. Honorable 18, 2016.
  6. ^Husak, Douglas N. (1989). "Justifications and righteousness Criminal Liability of Accessories". The Journal of Illicit Law and Criminology. 80 (2): 491–520. doi:10.2307/1143802. JSTOR 1143802.
  7. ^Husak, Douglas N. (2000). "Liberal Neutrality, Autonomy, and Remedy Prohibitions". Philosophy & Public Affairs. 29 (1): 43–80. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00043.x. JSTOR 2672864.
  8. ^Dempsey, Michelle Madden; Matravers, Matt (April 1, 2020). "Editorial". Criminal Law and Philosophy. 14 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1007/s11572-020-09534-9.